Thanks for your thoughtful response. What evidence can you offer that it is a sexually transmitted illness? A study of "sero-discordant" couples with one person becoming positive would at least give some evidence. However, Padian et al is the longest, largest, and best controlled study I am aware of.
Another key piece of evidence is from the CDC itself - the number of HIV positive people in the United States has been steady with no significant increase or decrease ever since they started measuring it back in the 1980's. Infectious illnesses do not behave that way, especially if it is a new infectious illness as HIV and AIDS were claimed to be. A good discussion of some of these many holes in standard non-scientific beliefs about HIV is in the video link below: The interview starts around 2:00, with Rebecca Culshaw Smith who has a PhD in mathematical modelling of HIV. During her PhD research she found irreconcilable problems between the standard narrative and what research actually shows - just as with the HIV study from Padian et al that I describe in my newsletter.
Maybe repeated sexual encounter with the positive person can lead to infection not just once but over a period of time, other wise how do we have 38 millions of people living with HIV, mostly having had unprotected sex?
Thanks for your thoughtful response. What evidence can you offer that it is a sexually transmitted illness? A study of "sero-discordant" couples with one person becoming positive would at least give some evidence. However, Padian et al is the longest, largest, and best controlled study I am aware of.
Another key piece of evidence is from the CDC itself - the number of HIV positive people in the United States has been steady with no significant increase or decrease ever since they started measuring it back in the 1980's. Infectious illnesses do not behave that way, especially if it is a new infectious illness as HIV and AIDS were claimed to be. A good discussion of some of these many holes in standard non-scientific beliefs about HIV is in the video link below: The interview starts around 2:00, with Rebecca Culshaw Smith who has a PhD in mathematical modelling of HIV. During her PhD research she found irreconcilable problems between the standard narrative and what research actually shows - just as with the HIV study from Padian et al that I describe in my newsletter.
https://www.brighteon.com/1fa17ee3-a81b-47d6-805d-9d41d133b000?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Maybe repeated sexual encounter with the positive person can lead to infection not just once but over a period of time, other wise how do we have 38 millions of people living with HIV, mostly having had unprotected sex?